Author |
Topic |
|
wcerto
Ahonui
USA
5052 Posts |
|
Bau
Lokahi
USA
226 Posts |
Posted - 04/09/2011 : 01:57:02 AM
|
wow neat thanks |
|
|
ypochris
Lokahi
USA
398 Posts |
Posted - 04/10/2011 : 09:19:28 AM
|
I'll be castigated for saying this, but after reading her book it was clear to me how Hawaiians lost their country. Liliuokalani could go on for pages about who was there, who wore what, etiquette, the furniture, what was served- seemingly anything but the politics of the situation.
What did she actually do to try and force a restoration, besides touring the United States? |
|
|
wcerto
Ahonui
USA
5052 Posts |
Posted - 04/10/2011 : 10:19:53 AM
|
She yeilded to far superior military forces in an effort to minimize the deaths that would occur to the Hawaiian people should further armed conflict took place. She mistakenly thought that the government of the United States was honorable and would yield to the appropriate world opinion and proper diplomatic interventions. She tried the nonviolent approach which, in retrospect, was probably the best approach, because there was no great military force in and of the Hawaiian people.
Today is the 134th anniversary of the day she made her official protest to the treaty of annexation. Here is what she had to say on the matter:
---------------------------------------------------------- MY OFFICIAL PROTEST TO THE TREATY
"I, LILIUOKALANI of Hawaii, by the will of God named heir apparent on the tenth day of April, A. D. 1877, and by the grace of God Queen of the Hawaiian Islands on the seventeenth day of January, A. D. 1893, do hereby protest against the ratification of a certain treaty, which, so I am informed, has been signed at Washington by Messrs. Hatch, Thurston, and Kinney, purporting to cede those Islands to the territory and dominion of the United States. I declare such a treaty to be an act of wrong toward the native and part-native people of Hawaii, an invasion of the rights of the ruling chiefs, in violation of international rights both toward my people and toward friendly nations with whom they have made treaties, the perpetuation of the fraud whereby the constitutional government was overthrown and, finally, an act of gross injustice to me.
"Because the official protests made by me on the seventeenth day of January, 1893, to the so-called Provisional Government was signed by me, and received by said government with the assurance that the case was referred to the United States of America for arbitration.
YIELDED TO AVOID BLOODSHED.
"Because that protest and my communications to the United States Government immediately thereafter expressly declare that I yielded my authority to the forces of the United States in order to avoid bloodshed, and because I recognized the futility of a conflict with so formidable a power.
"Because the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, and an envoy commissioned by them reported in official documents that my government was unlawfully coerced by the forces, diplomatic and naval, of the United States; that I was at the date of their investigations the constitutional ruler of my people.
"Because such decision of the recognized magistrates of the United States was officially communicated to me and to Sanford B. Dole, and said Dole's resignation requested by Albert S. Willis, the recognized agent and minister of the Government of the United States.
"Because neither the above-named commission nor the government which sends it has ever received any such authority from the registered voters of Hawaii, but derives its assumed powers from the so-called committee of public safety, organized on or about the seventeenth day of January, 1893, said committee being composed largely of persons claiming American citizenship, and not one single Hawaiian was a member thereof, or in any way participated in the demonstration leading to its existence.
"Because my people, about forty thousand in number, have in no way been consulted by those, three thousand in number, who claim the right to destroy the independence of Hawaii. My people constitute four-fifths of the legally qualified voters of Hawaii, and excluding those imported for the demands of labor, about the same proportion of the inhabitants.
CIVIC AND HEREDITARY RIGHTS.
"Because said treaty ignores, not only the civic rights of my people, but, further, the hereditary property of their chiefs. Of the 4,000,000 acres composing the territory said treaty offers to annex, 1,000,000 or 915,000 acres has in no way been heretofore recognized as other than the private property of the constitutional monarch, subject to a control in no way differing from other items of a private estate.
"Because it is proposed by said treaty to confiscate said property, technically called the crown lands, those legally entitled thereto, either now or in succession, receiving no consideration whatever for estates, their title to which has been always undisputed, and which is legitimately in my name at this date.
"Because said treaty ignores, not only all professions of perpetual amity and good faith made by the United States in former treaties with the sovereigns representing the Hawaiian people, but all treaties made by those sovereigns with other and friendly powers, and it is thereby in violation of international law.
"Because, by treating with the parties claiming at this time the right to cede said territory of Hawaii, the Government of the United States receives such territory from the hands of those whom its own magistrates (legally elected by the people of the United States, and in office in 1893) pronounced fraudulently in power and unconstitutionally ruling Hawaii.
APPEALS TO PRESIDENT AND SENATE.
"Therefore I, Liliuokalani of Hawaii, do hereby call upon the President of that nation, to whom alone I yielded my property and my authority, to withdraw said treaty (ceding said Islands) from further consideration. I ask the honorable Senate of the United States to decline to ratify said treaty, and I implore the people of this great and good nation, from whom my ancestors learned the Christian religion, to sustain their representatives in such acts of justice and equity as may be in accord with the principles of their fathers, and to the Almighty Ruler of the universe, to him who judgeth righteously, I commit my cause.
"Done at Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America, this seventeenth day of June, in the year eighteen hundred and ninety-seven.
"LILIUOKALANI. "JOSEPH HELELUHE. "WOKEKI HELELUHE } Witnesses to Signature." "JULIUS A. PALMER.
In the matter of providing me with seats in the diplomatic gallery at the ceremonies of the inauguration, I have already expressed my gratitude to Secretary John Sherman. It is but just that I should repeat here my appreciation of the kind, gallant, and courteous treatment again received at his official hands. For although it was my directions that this document should be delivered to any person authorized to receive it, yet as soon as Secretary Sherman saw the cards of my commissioners, he at once accorded them a private audience.
My protest, and a like remonstrance made on behalf of the patriotic leagues of the Hawaiian people by Hon. Joseph Heleluhe as their authorized commissioner, were both placed in the secretary's hands by that gentleman; and Mr. Sherman read them both through. He then turned to Captain Palmer, and had an agreeable conversation on the points at issue, after which my commissioners retired. The accustomed tissue of falsehoods was woven about this interview; some stating that Secretary Sherman had refused to see my messengers, others again giving the names of some one or other of his subordinates with whom my commissioners had had an interview, and finally asserting that the protests went into the archives of the department without examination, and were pigeon-holed; all of which statements, it is needless to say, were untrue. Secretary Sherman by his action showed that, a skilled diplomatist, he had not forgotten to remain a gallant gentleman. |
Me ke aloha Malama pono, Wanda |
|
|
ypochris
Lokahi
USA
398 Posts |
Posted - 04/10/2011 : 2:38:22 PM
|
"do hereby call upon the President of that nation, to whom alone I yielded my property and my authority, to withdraw said treaty"
Right there, she admits granting legal title to the crown lands, and sovereignty over Hawai'i, to the President of the United States.
Not too bright... |
Edited by - ypochris on 04/10/2011 2:39:21 PM |
|
|
rendesvous1840
Ha`aha`a
USA
1055 Posts |
Posted - 04/10/2011 : 4:08:55 PM
|
On the contrary, Her Majesty was very bright, and very well read. Naive, you can make a case for. She was not educated into the politics of other nations. The Ali`i were expected to do what was right for their people, and it was, to a great extent, a matter of honor and pride to them that they saw to the needs of their people. Knowing her obligations and discharging them to the best of her ability did not prepare her for the backstabbing ways of non-Hawaiian politics. She expected all monarchs, presidents, etc. to behave in a like manner. We today know this to not be the case, but she did not know this at the time. When the British restored the Hawaiian Kingdom, it would have looked to the Hawaiian people as if all leaders were guided by the same ideals. I don't think she had much in the way of alternatives to her actions, either. If Hawai1i had a military, the Bayonet Constitution would never have happened. Thurston and his band of cutthroats would have been arrested. Another thing she didn't realize was the strength of the the business interests controlling the US government. She was watching from too far away to really see what dirty dogs our government possesses, until they came and bit her. Unko Paul |
"A master banjo player isn't the person who can pick the most notes.It's the person who can touch the most hearts." Patrick Costello |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|