Author |
Topic |
Darin
Lokahi
USA
294 Posts |
Posted - 01/07/2005 : 04:28:03 AM
|
I asked a question a few months ago about which strings squeek the least. Just thought I'd share after trying out the responses. Elixir polywebs squeek the least, cause they're the most coated. Nanowebs come in second. Regular phosphor bronze comes in next. I find that the Elixirs sacrifice some tone for slack key music, so it's a bit of a tradeoff. Also, playing on the pads of the fingers reduces squeeks, as opposed to the calluses on the tips. Thanks all for the input!
|
Darin http://www.hawaiiguitar.com/ |
|
slackkeymike
Lokahi
440 Posts |
Posted - 01/07/2005 : 6:39:22 PM
|
I am a HUGE fan of Elixirs. Love those strings. I use Medium strings. However, I do not have a problem with string squeek noise...in fact, I believe it adds to the music.
Mike |
Aloha, Mike |
|
|
slackkeymike
Lokahi
440 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2005 : 4:13:25 PM
|
Just a funny side note. I have that condition known as "40 something eyes" or "shortenin' of da arms". Anyways, my wife gave me some reading glasses the other day...while I was practicing, I happened to look down at the strings (Elixir, Polywebs), and I could SEE fuzz all over them (fret locations and over the picking area).
I laughed at my self for a while.
Did not realize that that stuff "fuzzed" off.
Mike |
Aloha, Mike |
|
|
`Ilio Nui
`Olu`olu
USA
826 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2005 : 5:09:03 PM
|
I too think it adds to the esthetic of the guitar sound; to a degree. I've recorded many acoustic players through the years and the good players know when and how and to what degree to use them. The poor players have never practiced the techniques to limit them. I remember my first lesson with Ozzie. He spent a great deal of time teaching how to limit them. Keola once said to me that eliminating them was the Engineer's problem. He was messin' with me a little, because I know for a fact that he practices to keep them at a minimum. After that, it is the Engineer's problem. And for me, I can solve the problem.
That said, I've become a real fan of Elixir Nanowebs. They don't fray like the Polys and they are a little brighter. It seems to me they sound their best at day three, so whenever I set up to record myself, I change strings three days before. John Pearse sound best at about six hours and you have about two days worth of recording life. They are remarkable sounding, but they don't last long. You also need excellent squeak technique if you're going to record with them. All this is IMHO.
Dave |
|
|
slackkeymike
Lokahi
440 Posts |
Posted - 01/09/2005 : 9:04:13 PM
|
Interesting point. My copy of Punehele, Ray Kane, is very interesting. I have listened to it hundred's of times. Recently, my wife gave me a set of noise canceling headphones (Phillips) for Christmas. With those headphones on AND active noise cancelling engaged, I can hear every finger movement (slide) and many breaths tha the takes. I like it...makes it seem closer.
Mike |
Aloha, Mike |
Edited by - slackkeymike on 01/16/2005 04:06:32 AM |
|
|
Larry Miller
Akahai
USA
65 Posts |
Posted - 01/16/2005 : 10:08:09 AM
|
On a medium or medium light set, what gauge would be right for an unwound plain third? .20? .24?
There are such strings. Has anyone tried this?
|
Whee ha!
Larry M |
|
|
Lawrence
Ha`aha`a
USA
1597 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2005 : 07:49:50 AM
|
Yes - an unwound third is what I almost always have.
I use a .020 or .022 diameter with a light guage set, and a .022 or .024 diameter with a heavy set. I made a string diameter calculator in MathCad which calculates the optimal diameter for either wound or unwound strings for any tuning. It turns out that you do not have to be too precise, ergo the variation above.
With unwound strings for the highest three, there is MUCH less squeak, but I still have to be careful when sliding on the 4th.
I am not the only player who uses a solid third, there are, or have been, several well known players who have used this approach (but I forget who at the moment).
|
Mahope Kākou... ...El Lorenzo de Ondas Sonoras |
Edited by - Lawrence on 01/17/2005 07:53:28 AM |
|
|
RJS
Ha`aha`a
1635 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2005 : 11:28:50 AM
|
String squuek bothers me a lot -- unfortunately I'm not a good enough musician to avoid it. Oh well, I guess that's another thing on my list of stuff I'm learning to live with. |
|
|
slackkeymike
Lokahi
440 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2005 : 4:47:20 PM
|
Who makes strings with unwound thirds? Or, are you taking the b string from a heavier set?
BTW, Is it possible to buy string "on a roll"?
Mike |
Aloha, Mike |
|
|
wdf
Ha`aha`a
USA
1153 Posts |
Posted - 01/18/2005 : 11:53:14 AM
|
Like RJS, the squeeking really bothers me (like fingernails on a chalkboard). I also use Elixer Polywebs but haven't noticed any fraying. |
Dusty |
|
|
Lawrence
Ha`aha`a
USA
1597 Posts |
Posted - 01/18/2005 : 1:15:11 PM
|
I usually buy an Elixr nanoweb set and also as single solid string for the third at the same time (costs me about $1.50 more). Most music shops have single strings for sale. This means I have lots of leftover wound 3rd strings lying around (Maybe I can sell them all down on HighWay 61, along with the red, white and blue shoe strings!)
On a roll?? - the problem is the fastening at the saddle. I figure it is worth the $1.50 to have the little "ball" already attached.
|
Mahope Kākou... ...El Lorenzo de Ondas Sonoras |
|
|
Fran Guidry
Ha`aha`a
USA
1579 Posts |
|
slackkeymike
Lokahi
440 Posts |
Posted - 01/18/2005 : 2:52:30 PM
|
Yeah, on a roll! Never thought about that before...but the little thingy on the end bothered me too. Still, after all, I would have thought someone would have created such a system.
Mike |
Aloha, Mike |
|
|
chip
Aloha
Canada
38 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2005 : 5:45:31 PM
|
Mike GHS strings has lots of unwound 3rd strings going to .26. Icouldn`t go back to a 3rd wound after unwound, the squeek there has gone forever. An article on Robert Johnson, who used an unwound, led me to search one out, as a beginner Interm.what a god send. chip |
|
|
Reid
Ha`aha`a
Andorra
1526 Posts |
Posted - 01/21/2005 : 03:30:01 AM
|
For those who use unwound 3rd strings, a couple of questions:
1. The 3rd string (usually G) is very near the breaking point at that tension, and even if tuned *down* and up and *down* again, we have had them pop, regardless of brand. Is there any different behavior with these unwound 3rd strings,especially the larger diameters?
2. Is there a noticeable sonic difference between wound and unwound when plucked (apart from the squeak issue)?
3. What do they feel like on the *picking* finger/nail.
...Reid |
|
|
Lawrence
Ha`aha`a
USA
1597 Posts |
Posted - 01/21/2005 : 09:53:11 AM
|
Reid,
1) I almost never break my solid G string, can't remember ever breaking one in fact.
2) Yes- there is a noticable sound difference, some people don't like the solid third sound very much, but to me it sounds more like the first and second strings so I consider the three to be a "trio". The diameter makes a big difference, the fatter sting will sound louder due to the greater tension, so fatter is better in that regard. However you do not want to exceed 20lbs or so of tension so that the neck strain it not too great. Dreadnaughts with a 25.5 inch scale length and medium gauge strings run about 18lbs per string, if I remember correctly (this can be looked up). I probably make a small unconsious change to my plucking style to accomodate the solid string. You can hear what it sounds like on the FIRST Taropatch CD on the song Ku'u Lei Awapuhi. On the second TaroPatch CD, I was in an extreme hurry so I used 1.5 year-old strings and did not do as careful a job on the recording either (had to get it all done in about 4 hours), so don'judge by this recording!
3) They feel like the 1st and 2nd string, only slightly tighter, mainly on the fingering hand. You and Sarah can try it and see if you like it, however give it a fair shake and play with it for at least a month before making any firm conclusions.
|
Mahope Kākou... ...El Lorenzo de Ondas Sonoras |
Edited by - Lawrence on 01/21/2005 09:56:06 AM |
|
|
Topic |
|